4.6 Article

MyD88 Is Dispensable for Cerebral Amyloidosis and Neuroinflammation in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 11, 页码 2855-2861

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.07.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS076794, R01 NS076794-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated microglia are associated with amyloid plaques in transgenic mouse models of cerebral amyloidosis and in human Alzheimer disease; yet, their implication in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis remains unclear. It has been suggested that microglia play dual roles depending on the context of activation, contributing negatively to disease pathogenesis by secreting proinflammatory innate cytokines or performing a beneficial role via phagocytosis of amyloid beta (A beta) deposits. Toll-like receptors, most of which signal through the adaptor protein myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), have been suggested as candidate A beta innate pattern recognition receptors. It was recently reported that MyD88 deficiency reduced brain amyloid pathology and microglial activation. To assess a putative role of MyD88 in cerebral amyloidosis and glial activation in APPswe/PS1 Delta E9 (APP/PS1) mice, we crossed MyD88-deficient (MyD88(-/-)) mice with APP/PS1 mice, interbred first filial offspring, and studied APP/PS1 MyD88(+/+), APP/PS1 MyD88(+/-), and APP/PSI MyD88(+/-) cohorts. Biochemical analysis of detergent-soluble and detergent-insoluble A 13140 or A beta(1-42) in brain homogenates did not reveal significant between-group differences. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed on amyloid plaque load or soluble fibrillar A beta by quantitative immunohistochemical analysis. In addition, neither activated microglia nor astrocytes differed among the three groups. These data suggest that MyD88 signaling is dispensable for A beta-induced glial activation and does not significantly affect the nature or extent of cerebral P-amyloidosis in APP/PS1 mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据