4.6 Article

Cerebrospinal Fluid α-Synuclein Predicts Cognitive Decline in Parkinson Disease Progression in the DATATOP Cohort

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 4, 页码 966-975

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  2. Parkinson Study Group
  3. NTH grants [NIEHS T32ES015459, AG033398, ES004696-5897, ES007033-6364, ES016873, ES019277, NS057567, NS060252, NS062684-6221, NS082137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most patients with Parkinson disease (PD) develop both cognitive and motor impairment, and biomarkers for progression are urgently needed. Although alpha-synuclein is altered in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with PD, it is not known whether it predicts motor or cognitive deterioration. We examined clinical data and alpha-synuclein in >300 unmedicated patients with PD who participated in the deprenyl and tocopherol antioxidative therapy of parkinsonism (DATATOP) study, with up to 8 years of follow-up. Longitudinal measures of motor and cognitive function were studied before (phase 1) and during (phase 2) levodopa therapy; cerebrospinal fluid was collected at the beginning of each phase. Correlations and linear mixed models were used to assess alpha-synuclein association with disease severity and prediction of progression in the subsequent follow-up period. Despite decreasing cc-synuclein (phase 1 to phase 2 change of -0.05 +/- 0.21 log-transformed values, P < 0.001), no correlations were observed between alpha-synuclein and motor symptoms. Longitudinally, lower alpha-synuclein predicted better preservation of cognitive function by several measures [Selective Reminding Test total recall alpha-synuclein x time interaction effect coefficient, -0.12 (P = 0.037); delayed recall, -0.05 (P = 0.002); New Dot Test, -0.03 (P = 0.002)]. Thus, alpha-synuclein, although not clinically useful for motor progression, might predict cognitive decline, and future longitudinal studies should include this outcome for further validation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据