4.6 Article

Overexpression of MHC Class I in Muscle of Lymphocyte-Deficient Mice Causes a Severe Myopathy with Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 183, 期 3, 页码 893-904

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Scientifique (INSERM)
  2. University of Rouen
  3. Fonds europeen de developpement regional (FEDER) program [33267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Muscle fibers do not normally express major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules, and their reexpression is a hallmark of inflammatory myopathies. It has been shown in mice that overexpression of MHC-I induces a poorly inflammatory myositis accompanied by the unfolded protein response (UPR), but it is unclear whether it is attributable to I-cell-mediated MHC-I-dependent immune responses or to MHC-I forced expression per se. Indeed, besides presenting antigenic peptides to CD8(+) T cells, MHC-I may also possibly exert nonimmunologic, yet poorly understood pathogenic effects. Thus, we investigated the pathogenicity of MHC-I expression in muscle independently of its immune functions. HT transgenic mice that conditionally overexpress H-2K(b) in muscle were bred to an immunodeficient Rag2(-/-) background. The muscle proteome was analyzed by label-free high-resolution protein quantitation and Western blot. Despite the absence of adaptive immunity, HT Rag2(-/-) mice developed a very severe myopathy associated with the cytoplasmic accumulation of H-2K(b) molecules. The UPR was manifest by up-regulation of characteristic proteins. In humans, we found that HLA class I molecules not only were expressed at the sarcolemma but also could accumulate intracellularly in some patients with inclusion body myositis. Accordingly, the UPR was triggered as a function of the degree of HLA accumulation in myofibers. Hence, reexpression of MHC-I in normally negative myofibers exerts pathogenic effects independently of its immune function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据