4.6 Article

Generation of Kidney from Pluripotent Stem Cells via Blastocyst Complementation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 180, 期 6, 页码 2417-2426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.03.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Science Technology Agency (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659446, 21790794] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because a shortage of donor organs has been a major obstacle to the expansion of organ transplantation programs, the generation of transplantable organs is among the ultimate goals of regenerative medicine. However, the complex cellular interactions among and within tissues that are required for organogenesis are difficult to recapitulate in vitro. As an alternative, we used blastocyst complementation to generate pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived donor organs in Vivo. We hypothesized that if we injected PSCs into blastocysts obtained from mutant mice in which the development of a certain organ was precluded by genetic manipulation, thereby leaving a niche for organ development, the PSC-derived cells would developmentally compensate for the defect and form the missing organ. In our previous work, we showed proof-of-principle findings of pancreas generation by injection of PSCs into pancreas-deficient Pdx1(-/-) mouse blastocysts. In this study, we have extended this technique to kidney generation using Sall1(-/-) mouse blastocysts. As a result, the defective cells were totally replaced, and the kidneys were entirely formed by the injected mouse PSC-derived cells, except for structures not under the influence of Sal1 expression (ie, collecting ducts and microvasculature). These findings indicate that blastocyst complementation can be extended to generate PSC-derived kidneys. This system may therefore provide novel insights into renal organogenesis. (Am J Pathol 2012, 180:2417-2424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.03.007)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据