4.6 Article

Renal Dendritic Cells Adopt a Pro-Inflammatory Phenotype in Obstructive Uropathy to Activate T Cells but Do Not Directly Contribute to Fibrosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 180, 期 1, 页码 91-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.039

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [565033]
  2. Go8 Australia-Germany DAAD
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFBTR57, KFO228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) is a well-characterized murine model of renal inflammation leading to fibrosis. Renal dendritic cells (DCs) constitute a significant portion of kidney leukocytes and may participate in local inflammation and have critical roles in antigen presentation. The heterogeneity in renal DC populations and surface marker overlap with monocytes/macrophages has made studying renal DCs difficult. These studies used CD11c-promoter driven reporter/depletion mice to study DCs hi vivo. Studying early local inflammatory events (day 3 of UUO), in vivo multiphoton imaging of the intact kidney of CD11c reporter mice revealed more dendrite extensions and increased activity of renal DCs in real time. Phenotypic analysis suggested resident DC maturation in obstructed kidneys with increased CD11b and less F4/80 expressed. CD11b(hi) Gr-1(+) inflammatory DCs were also present in obstructed kidneys. T-cell receptor transgenic mice revealed enhanced antigen-presenting capacity of renal DCs after UUO, with increased antigen-specific T-cell proliferation in vivo and ex vivo. However, conditional DC ablation at days 0, 2, or 4 did not attenuate fibrosis or apoptosis 7 days after UUO, and depletion at 7 days did not alter outcomes at day 14. Therefore, after UUO, renal DCs exhibit inflammatory morphological and functional characteristics and are more effective antigen-presenting cells, but they do not directly contribute to tubulointerstitial damage and fibrosis. (Am J Pathol 2012, 180:91-103; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.039)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据