4.6 Article

Promotion of Liver and Lung Tumorigenesis in DEN-Treated Cytoglobin-Deficient Mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 179, 期 2, 页码 1050-1060

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21390232]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
  3. Osaka City University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390232, 22650224] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytoglobin (Cygb) is a recently discovered vertebrate globin with molecular characteristics that are similar to myoglobin. To study the biological function of Cygb in vivo, we generated Cygb knockout mice and investigated their susceptibility to N,N-diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced tumorigenesis. Four-week-old male mice were administered DEN in drinking water at a dose of 25 ppm for 25 weeks or 0.05 ppm for 36 weeks. Cygb deficiency promoted the DEN-induced development of liver and lung tumors. All Cygb(+/-) and Cygb(-/-) mice treated with 25-ppm DEN exhibited liver tumors, compared with 44.4% of their wild-type counterparts. Lung tumors were present only in Cygb-deficient mice. More than 40% of Cygb(-/-) mice developed liver and lung tumors at the nontoxic dose of DEN (0.05 ppm), which did not induce tumors in wild-type mice. Cygb loss was associated with increased cancer cell proliferation, elevated extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Akt activation, overexpression of IL-1 beta, IL-6, Tnf alpha, and Tgf beta 3 mRNAs, and hepatic collagen accumulation. Cygb-deficient mice also exhibited increased nitrotyrosine formation and dysregulated expression of cancer-related genes (cyclin D2, p53, Pak1, Src, Cdkn2a, and Cebpa). These results suggest that Cygb deficiency induces susceptibility to cancer development in the liver and lungs of mice exposed to DEN. Thus, globins such as Cygb will shed new light on the biological features of organ carcinogenesis. (Am J Pathol 2011, 179:1050-1060; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.006)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据