4.6 Article

Complement 3 and Factor H in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid in Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and Multiple-System Atrophy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 178, 期 4, 页码 1509-1516

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES004696, NS057567, AG025327, AG033398, NS060252, NS062684, AG005136, AG008017]
  2. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  3. Cheng-Mei Shaw Endowment
  4. Nancy and Buster Alvord Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complement activation, a key component of neuroinflammation, has been reported in both Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it is unclear whether complement activation and neuroinflammation in general are distinctly different from each another in major neurodegenerative disorders. In the present study, cerebrospinal fluid complement 3 (C3) and factor H (FH) were measured and evaluated together with amyloid-beta(42) (A beta(42)), which in recent investigations was decreased in patients with PD, in particular those with cognitive impairment. The study included 345 participants: 126 patients with PD at various stages with or without cognitive impairment, 50 with AD, and 32 with multiple-system atrophy, and 137 healthy control individuals. In addition to changes in A beta(42) concentrations, there were clear differences in the patterns of complement profiles among neurodegenerative disorders. The C3/FH ratio demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating patients with multiple-system atrophy from those with AD or PD and control individuals. In addition, the C3/A beta(42) and FH/A beta(42) ratios not only correlated with PD severity approximated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale but also with the presence of cognitive impairment or dementia in PD. Both C3 and FH correlated with the severity of impairment in AD as indicated using Mini-Mental State Examination scores. (Am J Pathol 2011, 178:1509-1516; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.006)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据