4.6 Article

Determining Prostate Cancer-Specific Death through Quantification of Stromogenic Carcinoma Area in Prostatectomy Specimens

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 79-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.09.042

关键词

-

资金

  1. Adrienne Helis Malvin Medical Research Foundation
  2. NIH National Cancer Institute Tumor Microenvironment Network (TMEN) [U54CA126568-01]
  3. Baylor College of Medicine
  4. Helis Medical Research Foundation
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA126568, R01CA058093] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that reactive stroma grading in prostate cancer (PCa) is predictive of biochemical recurrence in prostatectomies and biopsies. In this study, we tested whether quantifying the percentage of reactive stromal grade 3 (RSG 3; stromogenic carcinoma pattern) in the entire tumor is predictive of PCa-specific death. Whole-mount prostatectomies operated by a single surgeon obtained between 1983 and 1998 were reviewed. Reactive stroma was evaluated as described previously, and areas of RSG 3 in the entire tumor were registered as percentages of total tumor. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox analyses. In all, 872 cases were evaluable. Quantification of RSG 3 percentage was an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, analyzed as a continuous or grouped variable. Patients with higher RSG 3 percentages (larger tumor areas with RSG 3) had a significantly decreased biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with a lower RSG 3 percentage, even within the Gleason score 7 subset of patients. A nomogram introduced this new variable to the model. Furthermore, quantification of RSG 3 percentage was significantly predictive of PCa-specific death. Quantification of the RSG 3 (stromogenic carcinoma) area in PCa provides additional novel information on prognosis. These data substantiate the concept that the tumor microenvironment holds significant predictive information, as well as biological significance. (Am J Pathol 2011, 178:79-87; 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.09.042)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据