4.6 Article

Renal Accumulation of Biglycan and Lipid Retention Accelerates Diabetic Nephropathy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 179, 期 3, 页码 1179-1187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs [BX000622]
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. Order of the Amaranth
  4. National Institutes of Health [RR020171]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 815, A5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperlipidemia worsens diabetic nephropathy, although the mechanism by which renal lipids accumulate is unknown. We previously demonstrated that renal proteoglycans have high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) binding affinity, suggesting that proteoglycan-mediated LDL retention may contribute to renal lipid accumulation. The aim of this study was to determine the relative effect of diabetes and hyperlipidemia on renal proteoglycan content. Diabetic and non-diabetic LDL receptor deficient mice were fed diets containing 0% or 0.12% cholesterol for 26 weeks, and then kidneys were analyzed for renal lipid and proteoglycan content. Diabetic mice on the high-cholesterol diet had accelerated development of diabetic nephropathy with elevations in urine albumin excretion, glomerular and renal hypertrophy, and mesangial matrix expansion. Renal lipid accumulation was significantly increased by consumption of the 0.12% cholesterol diet, diabetes, and especially by both. The renal proteoglycans biglycan and decorin were detectable in glomeruli, with a significant increase in renal biglycan content in diabetic mice on the high-cholesterol diet. Renal biglycan and renal apolipoprotein B were colocalized, and regression analyses showed a significant relation between renal biglycan and renal apolipoprotein B content. The increased renal biglycan content in diabetic nephropathy probably contributes to renal lipid accumulation and the development of diabetic nephropathy. (Am J Pathol 2011, 179:1179-1187; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.016)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据