4.6 Article

Direct Leukocyte Migration across Pulmonary Arterioles and Venules into the Perivascular Interstitium of Murine Lungs during Bleomycin Injury and Repair

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 178, 期 6, 页码 2560-2572

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.047

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During acute lung injury and repair, leukocytes are thought to enter the lung primarily across alveolar capillaries and postcapillary venules. We hypothesized that leukocytes also migrate across pulmonary arterioles and venules, which serve as alternative sites for leukocyte influx into the lung during acute lung injury and repair. Lung sections from C57BL/6J mice up to 14 days after intratracheal bleomycin (3.33 U/kg) or saline instillation were assessed by light, fluorescence, confocal, and transmission electron microscopy for evidence of inflammatory cell sequestration and transmigration at these sites. After bleomycin treatment, large numbers of leukocytes (including neutrophils, eosinophils, and monocytes) were present in the vascular lumina and in perivascular interstitia of pulmonary arterioles and venules, as well as within the vascular walls. Leukocytes were observed within well-defined pathways in arteriolar walls and much less structured pathways in venular walls, apparently in the process of transmigration. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) were expressed at sites of leukocyte interaction with the luminal surface, especially in arterioles. Leukocytes appeared to exit from the vessels near collagen fibers into the perivascular interstitium. Results indicate that leukocytes can directly migrate across arteriolar and venular walls into the perivascular interstitium, which may represent under-recognized pathway for leukocyte influx into the lung during injury and repair. (Am J Pathol 2011, 178:2560-2572; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.047)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据