4.6 Article

Cellular Plasticity of Inflammatory Myeloid Cells in the Peritoneal Foreign Body Response

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 176, 期 1, 页码 369-380

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090545

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Kidney Foundation
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award
  5. Medical Research Council [G9900991B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Implantation of sterile foreign objects in the peritoneal cavity of an animal initiates an inflammatory response and results in encapsulation of the objects by bone marrow-derived cells. Over time, a multilayered tissue capsule develops with abundant myofibroblasts embedded in extracellular matrix. The present study used the transgenic MacGreen mouse to characterize the time-dependent accumulation of monocyte subsets and neutrophilic granulocytes in the inflammatory infiltrate and within the tissue capsule by their differential expression of the csf1r-EGFP transgene, F4/80, and Ly6C. As the tissue capsule developed, enhanced green fluorescent protein-positive cells changed from rounded to spindle-shaped morphology and began to co-express the myofibroblast marker a-smooth muscle actin. Expression increased with time: at day 14, 11.13 +/- 0.67% of tissue capsule cells co-expressed these markers, compared with 50.77 +/- 12.85% of cells at day 28. The importance of monocyte/macrophages in tissue capsule development was confirmed by clodronate-encapsulated liposome removal, which resulted in almost complete abrogation of capsule development. These results confirm the importance of monocyte/macrophages in the tissue response to sterile foreign objects implanted in the peritoneal cavity. in addition, the in vivo plasticity of peritoneal macrophages and their ability to transdifferentiate from a myeloid to mesenchymal phenotype is demonstrated. (Am J Pathol 2010, 176:369-380; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090545)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据