4.6 Article

Ectopic T-Cell Specificity and Absence of Perforin and Granzyme B Alleviate Neural Damage in Oligodendrocyte Mutant Mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 176, 期 2, 页码 549-555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090722

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gemeinnutzige Hertie Foundation [1.01.1/07/12]
  2. Fritz-Thyssen Foundation [10.07.2.152]
  3. DFG [SFB581, TP A3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In transgenic mice overexpressing the major myelin protein of the central nervous system, proteolipid protein, CD8+ T-lymphocytes mediate the primarily genetically caused myelin and axon damage. in the present study, we investigated the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this immune-related neural injury. At first, we investigated whether T-cell receptors (TCRs) are involved in these processes. For this purpose, we transferred bone marrow from mutants carrying TCRs with an ectopic specificity to ovalbumin into myelin mutant mice that also lacked normal intrinsic T-cells. T-lymphocytes with ovalbumin-specific TCRs entered the mutant central nervous system to a similar extent as T-lymphocytes from wild-type mice. However, as revealed by histology, electron microscopy and axon- and myelin-related immunocytochemistry, these T-cetls did not cause neural damage in the myelin mutants, reflecting the need for specific antigen recognition by cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells. By chimerization with bone marrow from perforin- or granzyme B (Gzmb)-deficient mice, we demonstrated that absence of these cytotoxic molecules resulted in reduced neural damage in myelin mutant mice. Our study strongly suggests that pathogenetically relevant immune reactions in proteolipid protein-overexpressing mice are TCR-dependent and mediated by the classical components of CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity, perforin, and Gzmb. These findings have high relevance with regard to our understanding of the pathogenesis of disorders primarily caused by genetically mediated oligodendropathy. (Am J Pathol 2010, 176:549-555; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090722)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据