4.6 Article

Brain Endothelial Cells Synthesize Neurotoxic Thrombin in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 176, 期 4, 页码 1600-1606

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090406

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG15964, AG020569, AG028367]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG020569, R01AG015964, R01AG028367] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by neuronal death; thus, identifying neurotoxic proteins and their source is central to understanding and treating AD. The multifunctional protease thrombin is neurotoxic and found in AD senile plaques. The objective of this study was to determine whether brain endothelial cells can synthesize thrombin and thus be a source of this neurotoxin in AD brains. Microvessels were isolated from AD patient brains and from age-matched controls. Reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated that thrombin message was highly expressed in microvessels from AD brains but was not detectable in control vessels. Similarly, Western blot analysis of microvessels showed that the thrombin protein was highly expressed in AD- but not control-derived microvessels. In addition, high levels of thrombin were detected in cerebrospinal fluid obtained from AD but not control patients, and sections from AD brains showed reactivity to thrombin antibody in blood vessel walls but not in vessels from controls. Finally, we examined the ability of brain endothelial cells in culture to synthesize thrombin and showed that oxidative stress or cell signaling perturbations led to increased expression of thrombin mRNA in these cells. The results demonstrate, for the first time, that brain endothelial cells can synthesize thrombin, and suggest that novel therapeutics targeting vascular stabilization that prevent or decrease release of thrombin could prove useful in treating this neurodegenerative disease. (Am J Pathol 2010, 176:1600-1606; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090406)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据