4.6 Article

Development of Sporadic Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Tumors Involves Hypermethylation at Methylated-In-Tumor Loci in Adenoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 177, 期 5, 页码 2347-2356

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091103

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leslie and Susan Gonda (Goldschmied) Foundation (Los Angeles, CA)
  2. Ruth and Martin H. Weil Fund (Los Angeles, CA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and genomic hypermethylation of methylated-in-tumor (MINT) loci are both strong prognostic indicators in a subgroup of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study was designed to determine whether the methylation of MINT loci during the progression of adenoma to CRC is related to MSI in CRC cases. Methylation index (MI) was measured by absolute quantitative assessment of methylated alleles at seven MINT loci in primary CRC with contiguous adenomatous and normal tissues of 79 patients. Results were then validated in primary CRC tissues from an independent group of 54 patients. Increased MI of both MINT loci 1 and 31 was significantly associated with MSI in CRC and was specific for adenoma. Total MI and the number of methylated loci were threefold (P = 0.02) and fivefold (P = 0.004) higher, respectively, in adenomas associated with microsatellitestable CRC versus microsatellite-unstable CRC. MINT MI was found to be correlated with mismatch repair protein expression, MSI, BRAF (V600E) mutation status, mut-L homologue 1 methylation status, and disease-specific survival in the second independent validation group of patients. MI of specific MINT loci may be prognostic indicators of colorectal adenomas that will develop into sporadic microsatellite-unstable CRCs. Increased MINT locus methylation appears to precede MSI and may have utility in defining clinical pathology in the absence of features of malignant invasive tumors. (Am J pathol 2010, 177:2347-2356; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091103)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据