4.6 Article

The Cellular Biology of Flexor Tendon Adhesion Formation An Old Problem in a New Paradigm

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 175, 期 5, 页码 1938-1951

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090380

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Manchester/Renovo Lectureship
  2. Royal College of Surgeons of Edin
  3. Renovo Plc.
  4. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2006-06-004] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrasynovial flexor tendon injuries of the hand can frequently be complicated by tendon adhesions to the surrounding sheath, limiting finger function. We have developed a new tendon injury model in the mouse to investigate the three-dimensional cellular biology of intrasynovial flexor tendon healing and adhesion formation. We investigated the cell biology using markers for inflammation, proliferation, collagen synthesis, apoptosis, and vascularization/myofibroblasts. Quantitative immunohistochemical image analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction with cell mapping was performed on labeled serial sections. Flexor tendon adhesions were also assessed 21 days after wounding using transmission electron microscopy to examine the cell phenotypes in the wound. When the tendon has been immobilized, the mouse can form tendon adhesions in the flexor tendon sheath. The cell biology of tendon healing follows the classic wound healing response of inflammation, proliferation, synthesis, and apoptosis, but the greater activity occurs in the surrounding tissue. Cells that have multiple fibripositors and cells with cytoplasmic protrusions that contain multiple large and small diameter fibrils can be found in the wound during collagen synthesis. In conclusion, adhesion formation occurs due to scarring between two damaged surfaces. The mouse model for flexor tendon injury represents a new platform to study adhesion formation that is genetically tractable. (Am J Pathol 2009, 175:1938-1951; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090380)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据