4.6 Article

Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-2 Is Increased in Alzheimer's Disease and Up-Regulated by Aβ

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 175, 期 1, 页码 262-270

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081054

关键词

-

资金

  1. James Tudor Foundation
  2. Sigmund Gestetner Foundation
  3. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-EG2003A-3, ART-EG2005B-1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is thought to be caused by the accumulation of amyloid beta (A beta) peptide within the brain. Endothelin-converting enzyme-2 (ECE-2), which is expressed in neural tissues, cleaves 'big endothelin' to produce the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1. ECE-2 also degrades A beta. We have examined ECE-2 expression in the temporal cortex of brain tissue from patients with AD, vascular dementia, and controls. Immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies showed ECE-2 to be abundant within pyramidal neurons in both the hippocampus and neocortex, but also to be present in certain astrocytes and microglia, particularly in AD brains. Quantitative real-time PCR showed ECE-2 mRNA to be markedly elevated in AD but not in vascular dementia. ECE-2 protein concentration, measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, was also significantly elevated in AD but not in vascular dementia. Exposure of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells to monomeric or oligomeric A beta(1-42) caused an initial decrease in ECE-2 mRNA at 4 hours, but a marked increase by 24 hours. Our findings indicate that A beta accumulation in AD is unlikely to be caused by ECE-2 deficiency. However, ECE-2 expression is up-regulated, perhaps to minimize A beta accumulation, but this may also be a mechanism through which endothelin-1 production is increased and cerebral blood flow is reduced in AD. Our findings suggest that endothelin-1 receptor antagonists, already licensed for treating other diseases, could be of benefit in AD therapies. (Am J Pathol 2009, 175:262-270; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081054)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据