4.6 Article

Notch1 Signaling in FIZZ1 Induction of Myofibroblast Differentiation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 174, 期 5, 页码 1745-1755

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080618

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL28737, HIL31963, HL52285, HIL77297]
  2. Sandier Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Notch1 is an evolutionarily conserved receptor that regulates cell fate, including such events as differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. Myofibroblast differentiation is a key feature of lung fibrosis. Found in inflammatory zone 1 (FIZZ1) has direct fibrogenic properties because of its ability to induce myofibroblast differentiation. However, the downstream signaling pathway that mediates FIZZ1 induction of myofibroblast differentiation remains unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the involvement of Notch signaling in FIZZ1 induction of lung myofibroblast differentiation and thus explore the potential role of Notch1 in pulmonary fibrosis. The results showed that FIZZ1 increased the expression levels of activated intracellular domain of Notch1 (NIC), its ligand Jagged1, and its target gene Hes1. which were associated with elevated a-smooth muscle actin expression levels. Fibroblast a-smooth muscle actin expression is induced by the overexpression of NIC but is suppressed by the inhibition of NIC. Moreover, lung fibroblasts that were isolated from mice lacking the GDP-4-keto-6-deoxymamiose3,5-epimerase-4-reductase enzyme (FX knockout) exhibited significantly reduced responsiveness to FIZZ1, which was reversed by fucose supplementation. In the absence of exogenous fucose, these FX-deficient cells exhibited defective fucosylation, which is required for Notch signaling. These knockout mice also showed impaired lung fibrosis. These findings suggest that Notch1 signaling in response to FIZZ1 may play a significant role in myofibroblast differentiation during lung fibrosis. (Am J Pathol 2009, 174:1745-1755; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080618)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据