4.6 Article

Cell Death and Learning Impairment in Mice Caused by in Vitro Modified Pro-NGF Can Be Related to Its Increased Oxidative Modifications in Alzheimer Disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 175, 期 6, 页码 2574-2585

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090018

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIS [PI020128, PI05/1570, PI05/2214]
  2. La Caixa Foundation (Carme Espinet) [BFU2009-11879/BFI, RD06/0013/0012, 2009SGR735, PI08/1843, PI05/2241, AGL2006-12433]
  3. La Caixa Foundation
  4. COST B-35 Action (Manuel Portero-Otin)
  5. BrainNet Europe II [LSHM-CT-2004-503039]
  6. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia jointly with FEDER [SAF2006-00619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pro-nerve growth factor (pro-NGF) is expressed at increased levels in Alzheimer's disease (AD)-affected brains and is able to induce cell death in cultures; however, the reasons for these phenomena remain elusive. Here we show that pro-NGF in human AD-affected hippocampus and entorhinal cortex is modified by advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products in a stage-dependent manner. These modifications block pro-NGF processing to mature NGF, thus making the proneurotrophin especially effective in inducing apoptosis of PC12 cells in culture through the p75 neurotrophin receptor. The processing of advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products in vitro modified recombinant human pro-NGF is severely impaired, as evidenced by Western blot and by examining its physiological functionality in cell cultures. We also report that modified recombinant human pro-NGF, as well as pro-NGF isolated from human brain affected by AD, cause impairment of learning tasks when administered intracerebroventricularly in mice, which correlates with AD-associated learning impairment. Taken together, the data we present here offer a novel pathway of ethiopathogenesis in AD caused by advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products modification of pro-NGF. (Am J Pathol 2009, 175:2574-2585; DOI:10.2353/ajpath.2009.090018)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据