4.6 Article

Analysis of tau phosphorylation and truncation in a mouse model of human tauopathy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 172, 期 1, 页码 123-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070627

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG010133] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-PG2004A-5] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U105184291, MC_U105184319] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U105184291, MC_U105184319] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIA NIH HHS [P30AG10133, P30 AG010133] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence has suggested that truncation of tau protein at the caspase cleavage site D421 precedes hyperphosphorylation and may be necessary for the assembly of tau into filaments in Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. Here we have investigated the time course of the appearance of phosphorylated and truncated tau in the brain and spinal cord of mice transgenic for mutant human P301S tau protein. This mouse line recapitulates the essential molecular and cellular features of the human tauopathies, including tau hyperphosphorylation, tau filament formation, and neurodegeneration. Soluble tau was strongly phosphorylated at 1 to 6 months of age. Low levels of phosphorylated, sarkosyl-insoluble tau were detected at 2 months, with a steady increase up to 6 months of age. Tau truncated at D421 was detected at low levels in Tris-soluble and detergent-soluble tau at 3 to 6 months of age. By immunoblotting, it was not detected in sarkosyl-insoluble tau. However, by immunoelectron microscopy, a small percentage of tau in filaments from brain and spinal cord of transgenic mice was truncated at D421. Similar findings were obtained using dispersed filaments from Alzheimer's disease and FTDP-17 brains. The late appearance and low abundance of tau ending at D421 indicate that it is unlikely that truncation at this site is necessary for the assembly of tau into filaments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据