4.4 Article

Vitamin D deficiency are associated with subjective disease severity in Chinese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 36-39

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.09.003

关键词

Vitamin D; Nasal polyps; Chronic rhinosinusitis; Vitamin D deficiency; Disease severity

资金

  1. Scientific research project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Health [2016KYA080]
  2. Zhejiang Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Science And Technology Plan [2017ZA078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the serum vitamin D level in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and its correlation with the disease severity. Setting: Hospital of Zhejiang University. Study design: Retrospective analysis of collected data. Subjects and methods: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were recruited. Demographic information including age, gender, body mass index, smoke history, atopic status and asthma was collected. Disease severity was measured by the Lund-Mackay CT score and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 score. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay preoperatively. Results: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were significantly lower in patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNP, 38.2 +/- 9.1 nmol/L; CRSsNP, 48.94 +/- 12.1 nmol/L; control, 54.1 +/- 17.1 nmol/L. p < 0.001), and the levels were significantly associated with the preoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 score (p = 0.013), but not with the Lund-Mackay score (p = 0.126). Furthermore, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were associated with the subjective improvement six months postoperatively (p < 0.001), Conclusion: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels are lower in Chinese CRSwNP patients. These 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels are associated with SNOT-22 score. Preoperative 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level may impact on the symptom improvement after surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据