期刊
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 456-480出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107300341
关键词
qualitative research; research quality; nonfoundational research
Within this article, the authors outline the political and institutional structures that work to formulate operating norms that govern what is considered to be acceptable qualitative organizational research, and the quality indicators attached to foundational, quasi-foundational, and nonfoundational research orientations. They argue that encouraging a plurality of methods and representations will better position the field of organizational studies to address the most significant questions of our time. Located within this position, they call for a democratization of what counts in organizational research: a more considered and central space for nonhegemonic approaches to qualitative work. In so doing, they champion a moral-sacred epistemology that foregrounds ethical and moral concerns as underpinning both the purpose and the quality of the research.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据