4.6 Article

Effects of bevacizumab (Avastin) on retinal cells in organotypic culture

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 3164-3171

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1265

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. Repetitive intravitreal injections of bevacizumab are a successful treatment option for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of bevacizumab in the adult mammalian neurosensory retina in culture. METHODS. Adult porcine neurosensory retinas were cultured adjoined to the retinal pigment epithelium-choroid layer (retina-RPE-choroid complex) in static culture for 3 days, whereas neural retinas alone were cultured in a perfusion chamber for 3 days. Bevacizumab was added to the culture and perfusion medium at three concentrations (0.25 mg/mL [n = 6], 0.5 mg/mL [n = 6], and 1.25 mg/mL [n = 6]). Retina-RPE-choroid complex and neural retinas alone cultured without bevacizumab were used as controls. After 3 days in culture, the neural retinas alone and the retina-RPE-choroid complexes were analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically for the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), vimentin, glutamine synthetase, rhodopsin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), and apoptosis. RESULTS. No toxic effects on ganglion or photoreceptor cells were observed at any concentration of bevacizumab. The expression of GFAP and vimentin was slightly increased in Muller cells, whereas glutamine synthetase and rhodopsin were unaffected by bevacizumab. However, significantly enhanced SMA expression in retina blood vessels was observed in retinas cultured in the presence of bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS. Bevacizumab was well tolerated by ganglion and photoreceptor cells even at concentrations fivefold higher than those used clinically. The increased expression of SMA is an indication of the loss of functional VEGF modulating smooth muscle cells in mature vessels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据