4.6 Article

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quantitative Assessment of Choriocapillaris Blood Flow in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 26-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To investigate choriocapillaris (CC) blood flow in unaffected fellow eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) using quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) analysis. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: Patients with acute, recurrent, or persistent CSC, along with healthy sex- and age-matched subjects, were included. Objective assessment of CC blood flow was performed using OCTA measurements. Total area of flow signal voids was quantified at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Active serous retinal detachment (SRD) was considered as a potential source of false-positive flow impairment; affected eyes were therefore excluded at onset and during follow-up, if this finding was unresolved at the time of measurement. RESULTS: Sixty patients with CSC and 60 control subjects were included in this study. The total average flow signal void area was significantly higher in the unaffected eyes of CSC patients at baseline (2.70 +/- 0.53 mm(2) vs 2.23 +/- 0.43 mm(2), P < .001). At 3 months, the total average flow signal void area was greater in the affected eyes of CSC patients with resolved SRD compared with unaffected eyes (3.25 +/- 0.77 mm(2) vs 2.67 0.68 mm(2), P < .001). This total average flow signal void area was larger in unaffected eyes at baseline in recurrent/persistent cases of CSC compared to acute forms (3.74 +/- 0.66 mm(2) vs 2.93 +/- 0.69 mm(2), P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular abnormalities in CSC involve CC hypoperfusion, suggestive of a primary choroidopathy including ischemic processes. These microvascular flow deficits may constitute one of a number of underlying sub clinical changes preceding CSC and other pachychoroid spectrum disorders. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据