4.6 Article

Avastin Doesn't Blind People, People Blind People

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 153, 期 2, 页码 196-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York
  2. National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland [P30 EY014801]
  3. Department of Defense, Washington, DC [W81XWH-09-1-0675]
  4. Allergan
  5. Alexion
  6. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Potentia
  9. Topcon
  10. Regeneron

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To review the appropriate preparation of bevacizumab for intravitreal injection by compounding pharmacies with specific recommendations designed to prevent microbial contamination. DESIGN: Perspective. METHODS: A review and discussion of compounding issues with supporting literature, clinical experience, illustrations, and expert opinion. RESULTS: Closer examination of the events surrounding the recent clusters of infectious endophthalmitis cases occurring after the intravitreal injection of bevacizumab suggest that the vision loss is not the result of the drug or the injection technique, but rather of the compounding procedures used to prepare the syringes containing the bevacizumab. Noncompliance with recognized standards and poor aseptic technique are the most likely causes of these outbreaks. The key to preventing these catastrophic occurrences depends on the implementation of and strict adherence to United States Pharmacopoeia Chapter 797 requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations arising from a root cause analysis of infectious endophthalmitis outbreaks should focus on the procedures used by pharmacies to compound bevacizumab. Microbial contamination of bevacizumab-containing syringes prepared from the same vial of drug can be avoided by using a single vial of bevacizumab for each eye or by following strict adherence to United States Pharmacopoeia Chapter 797 requirements when compounding a single vial of bevacizumab into multiple syringes. (Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:196-203. (C) 2012 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据