4.6 Article

The Lifetime Economic Burden of Keratoconus: A Decision Analysis Using a Markov Model

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 151, 期 5, 页码 768-773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [1 R03 EY017150-01]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York
  3. National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  4. Allergan
  5. Genentech
  6. Pfizer
  7. TreeAge Software

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To estimate the expected incremental lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus compared to the expected cost of the treatment of myopia. DESIGN: Cost estimate from the patient's perspective using a Markov decision model. METHODS: We modeled a hypothetical cohort of people with clinically significant incident keratoconus as defined by the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. We included costs of clinic visits, fitting fees, contact lenses, surgical procedures, and complications. Survival curves of corneal transplants and associated complications were modeled using data from the 2007 Australian Graft Registry. Medical treatment regimens after surgery were defined by expert opinion. RESULTS: The expected value of the lifetime cost of the treatment of keratoconus over myopia was $25 168 with a standard deviation of $16 247 and a median of $17 596. The factors that most influenced the lifetime cost were the probability of initial corneal transplant and a subsequent regraft. The cost of routine care had relatively little influence on the lifetime cost of care. CONCLUSIONS: The expected lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus represents a significant cost to patients and payors. While the cost of routine care for keratoconus is not trivial, the primary factor influencing changes in the cost of care for keratoconus is the probability of corneal transplant. Combined with the significantly impaired vision-related quality of life and the relatively young onset of disease, the economic burden of the treatment of keratoconus represents a significant public health concern. (Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:768-773. (C) 2011 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据