4.6 Article

Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C for Neovascular Glaucoma: Prognostic Factors for Surgical Failure

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 912-918

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19679008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors for surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 101 patients (101 eyes) with NVG treated at Kumamoto University Hospital. The primary endpoint was persistent intraocular pressure >= 22 mm Hg, deterioration of visual acuity to no light perception, and additional glaucoma procedures. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The mean follow,up period was 29.3 months (range, 0.5 to 142.3 months). The probability of success 1, 2, and 5 years after trabeculectomy was 62.6%, 58.2%, and 51.7%, respectively. The multivariate model showed that younger age (relative risk [RR], 0.96/year; P = .0007) and previous vitrectomy (RR, 1.62; P = .02) were prognostic factors for surgical failure among all NVG patients. Additionally, an eye with unremoved proliferative membrane and/or unrepaired retinal detachment (RD) after vitrectomy (RR, 1.59; P = .05) was a probable prognostic factor in a subgroup of 66 eyes with previous vitrectomy, and having a fellow eye with NVG (RR, 1.73; P = .003) was a significant prognostic factor in 82 eyes with NVG attributable to diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic factors for surgical failure of trabeculectomy with MMC for NVG were younger age and previous vitrectomy in all NVG patients, and having a fellow eye with NVG in patients with disease caused by diabetic retinopathy. Persistent proliferative membrane and/or RD after vitrectomy might contribute to poorer outcomes of trabeculectomy. (Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:912-918. (c) 2009 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据