4.6 Article

Effect of Triamcinolone Acetonide on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Occludin Levels in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 838-846

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To investigate the molecular mechanism by which triamcinolone acetonide (TA) may reduce edema in a porcine model of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: Animal study. METHOD: After baseline ophthalmoscopic examination and fundus photography, a BRVO was created photothrombotically in each eye of 6 pigs, using argon green photocoagulation and intravenous Rose Bengal. Following this, the left eye was injected intravitreally with 4 mg/0.1 ml TA. After 11 weeks, the eyes were re,examined. Fluorescein angiography, in addition to ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography, was performed. Following sacrifice of the animals, the eyes were enucleated and processed. The distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), occludin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were localized by immunofluorescence cytochemistry on 10 mu m frozen retinal sections of TA-treated and untreated eyes. RESULTS: Retinal VEGF levels were significantly lower in the TA-treated eyes as compared with the untreated eye (P = .002). Conversely occludin levels were significantly higher in the treated eye (P = .026). There was also a significant reduction in GFAP immunoreactivity in the Muller cells of the treated eyes (P = .015) with no statistical significance in the astrocytes (P = .065). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal TA down regulates VEGF, which may prevent a decrease in occludin and also inhibits an increase in GFAP expression in Muller cells. These events may contribute to a reduction in the blood retinal barrier breakdown that occurs in BRVO and promote resolution of the associated retinal edema. (Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147:838-846. (c) 2009 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据