4.6 Article

Vision improvement in retinal degeneration patients by implantation of retina together with retinal pigment epithelium

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 146, 期 2, 页码 172-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To demonstrate efficacy and safety of the implantation of neural retinal progenitor cell layers (sheets) with its retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients with 20/200 or worse vision in the surgery eye. DESIGN: Interventional nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: Ten patients (six RP, four AMD) received retinal implants in one eye and were followed in a phase II trial conducted in a clinical practice setting. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) was the prig mary outcome measure. All implant recipients and nine of 10 tissue donors were deoxyribonucleic acids typed. RESULTS: Seven patients (three RP, four AMD) showed improved EDTRS visual acuity (VA) scores. Three of these patients (one RP, two AMD) showed improvement in both eyes to the same extent. Vision in one RP patient remained the same, while vision in two RP patients de, creased. One RP patient has maintained an improvement in vision from 20/800 to 20/200 ETDRS for more than five years; at the six-year examination, it was still maintained at 20/320 while the nonsurgery eye had deteriorated to hand motion vision. This patient also showed a 22.72% increase in light sensitivity at five years compared to microperimetry results at two years; the other patients showed no improved sensitivity. Although no match was found between donors and recipients, no rejection of the implanted tissue was observed clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Seven (70%) of 10 patients showed improved VA. This outcome provides clinical evidence of the safety and beneficial effect of retinal implants and corroborates results in animal models of retinal degeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据