4.6 Review

Where vision meets memory: Prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 1695-1711

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm197

关键词

long-term memory; occipital cortex; parietal cortex; spatial cognition; temporal lobe

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR14075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [F32 AG05914] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH071702] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objects seen from unusual relative to more canonical views require more time to categorize and recognize, and, according to object model verification theories, additionally recruit prefrontal processes for cognitive control that interact with parietal processes for mental rotation. To test this using functional magnetic resonance imaging, people categorized and recognized known objects from unusual and canonical views. Canonical views activated some components of a default network more on categorization than recognition. Activation to unusual views showed that both ventral and dorsal visual pathways, and prefrontal cortex, have key roles in visual object constancy. Unusual views activated object-sensitive and mental rotation (and not saccade) regions in ventrocaudal intraparietal, transverse occipital, and inferotemporal sulci, and ventral premotor cortex for verification processes of model testing on any task. A collateral-lingual sulci place area activated for mental rotation, working memory, and unusual views on correct recognition and categorization trials to accomplish detailed spatial matching. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and object-sensitive lateral occipital sulcus activated for mental rotation and unusual views on categorization more than recognition, supporting verification processes of model prediction. This visual knowledge framework integrates vision and memory theories to explain how distinct prefrontal-posterior networks enable meaningful interactions with objects in diverse situations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据