4.6 Article

Bedside assessment of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.069

关键词

amniotic fluid; cytokine; histological chorioamnionitis; interleukin-6; microbial invasion of the amniotic fluid

资金

  1. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [NS 13461-4/2012]
  2. Charles University in Prague
  3. Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic [PRVOUK P37/10]
  4. Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove
  5. Swedish government grants (ALF) [ALFGBG-136431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic indices and predictive values by bedside assessment of amniotic fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) and/or histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty-four women with singleton pregnancies were included in this study. The amniotic fluid was sampled by transabdominal amniocentesis at the time of admission. IL-6 concentrations were assessed with an immunoassay. RESULTS: The presence of MIAC, HCA, or the coexistence of both was associated with higher amniotic fluid concentrations of IL-6 in both a crude and adjusted analysis. The amniotic fluid concentration of IL-6 of 1000 pg/mL was determined to be the best cutoff value for the prediction of MIAC (sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 82%, negative predictive value of 81%, and likelihood ratio of 8.4) or both MIAC and HCA (sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 75%, negative predictive value of 88%, and likelihood ratio of 9.4). CONCLUSION: The bedside assessment of amniotic fluid IL-6 seems to be an easy, rapid, and inexpensive method for the prediction of MIAC or both MIAC and HCA in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据