4.0 Article

Secular decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in adults with diabetes mellitus: cohort study

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 337, 期 7661, 页码 -

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39582.447998.BE

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To examine trends in fatal coronary heart disease in adults with and without diabetes. Design Cohort study. Setting Two surveys of the Nord-Trondelag health study (HUNT), a population based study in Norway. Participants 74 914 men and women from the first survey (1984-6) and 64 829 from the second survey (1995-7). Main outcome measure. Age specific mortality from coronary heart disease among adults with and without diabetes during two consecutive nine year follow-up periods. Results A total of 2623 men and 1583 women died from coronary heart disease. Mortality rates were substantially lower during the most recent follow-up period: among men aged 70-79 without diabetes, deaths per 1000 person years declined from 16.38 to 8.79 (reduction 48%, 95% confidence interval 39% to 55%) and among women aged 70-79 from 6.84 to 2.68 (62%, 52% to 70%). Among the same age group with diabetes, deaths per 1000 person years in men declined from 38.97 to 17.89 (54%, 32% to 69%) and in women from 28.15 to 11.83 (59%, 37% to 73%). The reduction was more noticeable in age groups younger than 70 at baseline, and less pronounced among people aged 80 or more. Mortality from coronary heart disease was more than twofold higher in people with than without diabetes, with a slightly stronger association in women. The difference in mortality by diabetes status remained almost unchanged from the first to the second survey. Conclusion The strong general reduction in mortality rates from coronary heart disease from the first to the second follow-up period also benefited people with diabetes, but the more than twofold higher mortality from coronary heart disease associated with diabetes persisted over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据