4.7 Article

Regulation of 26S Proteasome Activity in Pulmonary Fibrosis

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201412-2270OC

关键词

idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; myofibroblast differentiation; proteasome

资金

  1. Helmholtz Graduate School of Lung Biology and Disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: The ubiquitin-proteasome system is critical for maintenance of protein homeostasis by degrading polyubiquitinated proteins in a spatially and temporally controlled manner. Cell and protein homeostasis are altered upon pathological tissue remodeling. Dysregulation of the proteasome has been reported for several chronic diseases of the heart, brain, and lung. We hypothesized that proteasome function is altered upon fibrotic lung remodeling, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objectives: To investigate proteasome function during myofibroblast differentiation. Methods: We treated lung fibroblasts with transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and examined proteasome composition and activity. For in vivo analysis, we used mouse models of lung fibrosis and fibrotic human lung tissue. Measurements and Main Results: We demonstrate that induction of myofibroblast differentiation by TGF-beta involves activation of the 26S proteasome, which is critically dependent on the regulatory subunit Rpn6. Silencing of Rpn6 in primary human lung fibroblasts counteracted TGF-beta-induced myofibroblast differentiation. Activation of the 26S proteasome and increased expression of Rpn6 were detected during bleomycin-induced lung remodeling and fibrosis. Importantly, Rpn6 is overexpressed in myofibroblasts and basal cells of the bronchiolar epithelium in lungs of patients with IPF, which is accompanied by enhanced protein polyubiquitination. Conclusions: We identified Rpn6-dependent 26S proteasome activation as an essential feature of myofibroblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo, and our results suggest it has an important role in IPF pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据