期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 200, 期 4, 页码 -出版社
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.025
关键词
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; national guidelines; recommendations; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; small for gestational age
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare national guidelines regarding small for gestational age (SGA). STUDY DESIGN: Along with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin on abnormal growth, guidelines from England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were reviewed. RESULTS: There are no guidelines on SGA from Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline agrees with ACOG's definition of abnormal growth, but there are noticeable variances in the diagnosis and management of SGA. RCOG has more recommendations than ACOG (18 vs 4, respectively). The articles referenced varied, with only 13 similar articles being cited by the both committees. CONCLUSION: The differences in the 2 guidelines suggest that there is variance in how 2 committees synthesize the literature and issue recommendations.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据