4.6 Article

Detection of bacteria in placental tissues obtained from extremely low gestational age neonates

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.044

关键词

bacterial culture; placenta; polymerase chain reaction

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P30HD018655] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U01NS040069] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [P30-HD-18655] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [1 U01 NS 40069-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to quantify and identify aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma in the chorionic parenchyma. STUDY DESIGN: A sample of the chorionic parenchyma from neonates delivered between 23-27 completed weeks was cultured and tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods using universal bacterial primers for the presence of bacteria and mycoplasmas. RESULTS: The culture positive rate was higher for vaginal deliveries (333/ 489; 68%) than for cesarean sections (363/876; 41%). Thirty percent of all culture-positive samples had only aerobic bacteria, 21% of the samples had only anaerobic bacteria, and 9% of the samples had only Mycoplasma/ Ureaplasma. The mean concentration of Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma (4.00 +/- 1.11 log(10) CFU/g) was significantly higher (P < .001) than the total count of either aerobes (3.24 +/- 1.12 log(10) CFU/g) or anaerobes (2.89 +/- 0.99 log(10) CFU/g). Staphylococcus sp. and Corynebacterium sp. as well as organisms associated with bacterial vaginosis were the most frequently recovered. A PCR product was not detected from either randomly selected or known culture-positive samples. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of second-trimester placentas harbor organisms within the chorionic plate. The chorion parenchyma appears to harbor constituents that prevent the identification of bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid by PCR methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据