4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Identifying the causes of stillbirth: a comparison of four classification systems

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.098

关键词

cause of death; classification systems; stillbirth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To identify the classification protocol for stillbirth that minimizes the rate of unexplained causes. STUDY DESIGN: All stillbirths at > 22 weeks from 1995-2007 underwent a workup inclusive of fetal ultrasonography, amniocentesis for karyotype and cultures, placental histology, fetal autopsy, skin biopsy, total body X-ray, maternal testing for thrombophilias, TORCH, Parvovirus spp, thyroid function, indirect Coombs, Kleiheuer-Betke test, and genital cultures. To such a cohort, we applied the 4 most commonly used classification protocols. RESULTS: The stillbirth rate during the study period was 0.4% (154/37,958). The RoDeCo classification provided the lowest rate of unexplained stillbirth (14.3%) compared with Wigglesworth (47.4%), de Galan-Roosen (18.2%), and Tulip (16.2%) classifications. Mean gestational age at stillbirth in unexplained vs explained stillbirth was similar in the 4 protocols. CONCLUSION: Adoption of a consistent and appropriate workup protocol can reduce the rate of unexplained stillbirth to 14%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据