4.5 Article

Frequency and Location of Dilated Virchow-Robin Spaces in Elderly People: A Population-Based 3D MR Imaging Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 709-713

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2366

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. Caisse Nationale Maladie des Travailleurs Salaries, Direction Generale de la Sante, Multi-Generator, Institut de la Longevite, Conseils Regionaux of Aquitaine and Bourgogne, Fondation de France
  3. Ministry of Research-INSERM
  4. French Chinese Foundation for Science and Applications
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Association de Recherche en Neurologie Vasculaire
  7. Eisai pharmaceuticals
  8. French National Research Agency
  9. Sanofi-Synthelabo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: dVRS have been previously associated with aging and cerebrovascular diseases. However, little is known about their prevalence and topographic distribution in the general elderly population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: dVRS were evaluated by using high-resolution 3D MR imaging in 1826 subjects enrolled in the 3C-Dijon MR imaging study. On T1-weighted MR imaging, dVRS were detected according to 3D imaging criteria and rated by using 4-level severity scores based in the BG or in the WM. The number and anatomic location of large dVRS (>= 3 mm) were recorded. RESULTS: dVRS were observed in the BG or WM in every subject. The severity of dVRS was significantly associated with higher age in both the BG and WM, whereas sex was related to the severity of dVRS only in the BG. Large dVRS were detected in 33.2% of participants. Status cribrosum was found in 1.3% of participants. dVRS were also highly prevalent within the hippocampus (44.5%) and hypothalamus (11.6%). CONCLUSIONS: dVRS are always detected in the BG or WM in elderly people, and large dVRS are also prevalent. The topographic distribution of dVRS is not uniform within the brain and may depend on anatomic or pathologic characteristics interacting with aging and sex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据