4.5 Article

Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging Analysis of T2 Hypointense Lesion Components in Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 315-322

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2277

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  2. Astra Zeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Focal anaplasia characterized by T2 hypointensity, signal-intensity enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging and restricted water diffusion has been reported in a patient with juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma. We identified T2(HOF) with these MR imaging characteristics in children with DIPG and hypothesized that these represent areas of focal anaplasia; and may, therefore, have increased perfusion properties and should be characterized by increased perfusion. Thus, we used DSC to investigate our hypothesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the baseline MR imaging scans of 86 patients (49 girls, 37 boys; median age, 6.1 years; range, 1.1-17.6 years) treated for DIPG at our hospital (2004-2009). T2(HOF) with the described MR imaging characteristics was identified in 10 patients. We used a region of interest based approach to compare the ADC, FA, rCBV, rCBF, and rMTT of T2(HOF) with those of the typical T2(HRT). RESULTS: The ADC of T2(HOF) with the specified MR imaging characteristics was significantly lower than that of T2(HRT) (range, 0.71-1.95 mu m(2)/ms versus 1.36-2.13 mu m(2)/ms; P < .01); and the FA (range, 0.12-0.34 versus 0.07-0.24; P = .03) and rCBV (range, 0.4-2.62 versus 0.23-1.57; P = .01) values of T2(HOF)s were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that T2(HOF) in DIPG may represent areas of focal anaplasia and underline the importance of regional, rather than global, tumor-field analysis. T2(HOF) may be the ideal target when stereotactic biopsy of tumors that present with an inhomogeneous T2 signal intensity is considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据