4.5 Article

Assessment of Craniospinal Pressure-Volume Indices

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1645-1650

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2166

关键词

-

资金

  1. MTBH
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The PVIcc of the craniospinal compartment defines the shape of the pressure-volume curve and determines the damping of cyclic arterial pulsations. Despite no reports of direct measurements of the PVIcc among healthy elderly, it is believed that a change away from adequate accommodation of cardiac-related pulsations may be a pathophysiologic mechanism seen in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. In this study, blood and CSF flow measurements are combined with lumbar CSF infusion measurements to assess the craniospinal PVIcc and its distribution of cranial and spinal compartments in healthy elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy elderly were included (60-82 years of age). The cyclic arterial volume change and the resulting shift of CSF to the spinal compartment were quantified by PC-MR imaging. In addition, each subject underwent a lumbar CSF infusion test in which the magnitude of cardiac-related pulsations in intracranial pressure was quantified. Finally, the PVI was calculated by using a mathematic model. RESULTS: After excluding 2 extreme values, the craniospinal PVIcc was calculated to a mean of 9.8 +/- 2.7 mL and the estimated average 95% confidence interval of individual measurements was +/- 9%. The average intracranial and spinal contributions to the overall compliance were 65% and 35% respectively (n = 35). CONCLUSIONS: Combining lumbar CSF infusion and PC-MR imaging proved feasible and robust for assessment of the craniospinal PVIcc. This study produced normative values and showed that the major compensatory contribution was located intracranially.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据