4.5 Article

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Commissural and Projection White Matter in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and Correlation with Tuber Load

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1273-1277

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2033

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cortical and white matter changes have been identified outside the MR imaging-visible cortical/subcortical tubers in the tuberous sclerosis complex. The aim of this study was to evaluate DTI changes in the corpus callosum and internal capsules and to correlate the DTI changes with cortical/subcortical tuber load. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve TSC patients and 23 controls underwent MR imaging including DTI. FA, trace, D-parallel to, and D genu and splenium of corpus callosum and right and left internal capsules were assessed. The number and volume of cortical/subcortical tubers were correlated with DTI indices of corpus callosum and internal capsules. RESULTS: In the genu and splenium, FA was lower and trace (P < .01) and D-perpendicular to higher (P < .01), and in the internal capsules, trace was higher (P = .04) in TSC patients compared with controls. The total tuber volume correlated positively with trace of genu (r = 0.77, P < .01) and splenium (r = 0.69, P = .01) and with D-perpendicular to splenium (r = 0.68, P = .01), and negatively with FA of splenium (r = -0.60, P = .04) of corpus callosum. The left and right hemispheric tuber volume correlated positively with trace of left (r = 0.56, P = .05) and right (r = 0.67, P = .02) internal capsules. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of reduced FA, elevated trace, and elevated D-perpendicular to in the corpus callosum and internal capsules may be related to abnormalities in myelin. The correlations between tuber volume and DTI indices in corpus callosum and internal capsules suggested that more extensive malformation as demonstrated by larger tuber load was more likely to be associated with more severe DTI changes in the commissural and projection white matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据