4.5 Article

Characterization of the Hoechst 33342 side population from normal and malignant human renal epithelial cells

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 295, 期 3, 页码 F680-F687

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.90286.2008

关键词

kidney; renal cancer

资金

  1. British Urological Foundation Blackwell Publishing
  2. Sackler Foundation Scholarship
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500966] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0500966] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fundamental changes which predispose for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are poorly characterized. It is hypothesized that cancer stem cells may be influential in carcinogenesis, and the epithelial side population (SP) is enriched for stemlike cells in other epithelial cancers. In this study, we have isolated and characterized the SP and non-SP (NSP) populations from normal (NK) and malignant (RCC) human kidney tissue. NK specimens were taken from patients undergoing non-renal cancer surgery and paired malignant and macroscopically normal tissue samples were taken from patients undergoing surgery for RCC. The Hoechst 33342 dye efflux technique was used to isolate epithelial SP and NSP from normal and malignant human renal tissue. Cellular subpopulations were phenotyped for lineage, cell cycle, and putative stem cell markers, and functionally characterized using in vitro colony-forming and proliferation assays. The SP constituted 3.8 +/- 0.4 and 5.9 +/- 0.9% of epithelial cells in NK and RCC, respectively, of which 14.1 +/- 3.5 and 13.2 +/- 3.6% were shown to be in G(0). SP cells demonstrated greater proliferative potential in colony-forming efficiency, long-term culture, and spheroids assays and were shown to be maintained upon tissue culture passage. We have shown that the renal SP is enriched for quiescent cells, with a high proliferative capacity and stemlike properties. The population is, however, heterogeneous, confirming that the terms SP cell and stem cell cannot be used interchangeably.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据