4.5 Article

Reninoma: The Importance of Renal Vein Renin Ratios for Lateralisation and Diagnosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 16-19

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000357410

关键词

Secondary hypertension; Reninoma; Renal vein renin ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aim: Reninomas are rare juxtaglomerular tumours which can cause severe hypertension and hypokalaemia. Diagnosis can be problematic and these tumours can be difficult to locate on imaging. In this report we aim to demonstrate the value of carefully performed renal vein renin ratios (RVRRs) to assist in locating these tumours. Method/ Results: We report on 3 patients diagnosed with reninoma in our unit. The patients were all female, young (17, 16 and 30 years), severely hypertensive and hypokalaemic (2.5, 2.5 and 3.1 mmol/l). Plasma renin activity (PRA) was elevated (31.9, 274 and 175 ng/ml/h), and aldosterone was high-normal (19.9 ng/dl) or elevated (207 and 109.3 ng/dl). Renal artery stenosis was excluded by renal artery Doppler, DTPA scan and angiography. Renal CT detected the lesion in 2 patients, with one lesion visible on pre- and post-contrast CT and the other on post-contrast CT only. RVRRs were performed several weeks after withdrawing interfering medications, maintaining a < 40 mmol/day low-sodium diet and maintaining recumbency overnight the night before and during the procedure. Ratios before and after captopril or enalaprilat administration were obtained and lateralised the tumours in all 3 cases (dominant/non-dominant ratios of 2.3, 4.3 and 3.8). All of the patients underwent nephrectomy yielding a typical juxtaglomerular tumour and resulting in cure of hypertension and hypokalaemia. Conclusions: Reninoma should be suspected in young hypertensives (especially females) with significant hypokalaemia and high PRA or direct renin concentration after renovascular hypertension has been excluded. CT imaging and carefully performed RVRRs provide the highest likelihood of locating these tumours. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据