4.5 Article

Podocytes of AT2 Receptor Knockout Mice Are Protected from Angiotensin II-Mediated RAGE Induction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 309-317

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000329321

关键词

Angiotensin II; AT2 receptor; RAGE; Podocytes; Kidney; Advanced glycation end products; Inflammation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Wo 12-4, We1688/15-1, 16-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: The interaction of 'advanced glycation end products' (AGEs) and their receptor 'RAGE' plays an important role in diabetic nephropathy. We have previously found that in cultured differentiated podocytes, angiotensin II (ANG II) induces RAGE expression via an AT2 receptor-mediated pathway. Methods: To further confirm our results in an in vivo study, AT2 receptor knockout mice (AT2(-/-)) and wild-type mice were infused with ANG II by osmotic mini-pumps for 14 days. Results: As shown by immunohistochemistry, ANG II treatment of wild-type animals (C57BL6) allowed a significantly increased RAGE expression in renal podocytes in comparison to sham-operated C57BL6 mice. In contrast, RAGE expression in podocytes of ANG II-treated knockout mice (AT2(-/-)) was only moderately higher than in control animals, but significantly lower than in ANG II-treated wild-type mice. For the AGE species N epsilon-carboxymethyllysine, a similar immunohistochemical staining pattern was found. There was no significant change in glomerular AT1a receptor expression. However, no difference in RAGE mRNA expression could be found between ANG II-infused wildtype and AT2(-/-) animals by real-time PCR using whole kidney mRNA, presumably due to the low abundance of podocyte mRNA in these preparations. No effects were seen on glomerular apoptosis. Conclusion: These data support the fact that ANG II-mediated RAGE induction in podocytes occurs via AT2 receptors. The present findings may suggest that not all ANG II-mediated changes in diabetic nephropathy can be treated with AT1 receptor blockers. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据