4.5 Article

Low Aerobic Capacity and High-Fat Diet Contribute to Oxidative Stress and IRS-1 Degradation in the Kidney

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 112-119

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000204362

关键词

IRS-1; Reactive oxygen species; Aerobic capacity; Insulin resistance

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HL73101-01A1]
  2. Veterans Affairs Merit System [0018]
  3. National Center for Research Resources of NIH [R24 RR17718]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R24RR017718] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL073101] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Insulin receptor (IR-alpha and IR-beta) is reduced in the kidney of insulin-resistant rodents. It is unknown if there are also reductions in insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 or if these effects are due to metabolic injury. Thereby, we hypothesized intrinsically high aerobic fitness would protect against high-fat diet (HFD)-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and IRS-1 degradation. Methods: We investigated the effects of HFD on triglyceride content, ROS production and IRS-1 degradation in the kidney of high-capacity (HCR)/low-capacity (LCR) rats, a model of intrinsic high and low aerobic capacity. Eighteen-week-old HCR and LCR rats were placed on a HFD or normal chow diet for 7 weeks. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance, ROS, IR-beta, total IRS-1 and ubiquitination were measured. Results: The HCR displayed greater insulin sensitivity and were resistant to HFD-induced insulin resistance. In the LCR kidney, HFD increased ROS potential, and reduced total IR-alpha and IRS-1 without altering triacylglycerol content. IRS-1 ubiquitination was higher in the LCR than HCR kidney, increased after HFD. Conclusions: Our data support that HFD-mediated kidney ROS is associated with reductions in IRS-1 and systemic insulin resistance. Further, high intrinsic aerobic capacity protects against IRS-1 degradation in the kidney following exposure to HFD. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据