4.5 Article

Toll-like receptor 2 and renal allograft function

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 583-588

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000115974

关键词

kidney transplantation; renal function; toll-like receptor 2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Toll-like receptors (TLR) modulate the immune response. We analyzed the relationships between TLR expression in renal tissue with infection, rejection and graft function after kidney transplantation. Methods: TLR-2 and TLR-4 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in 257 protocol biopsies obtained 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after transplantation, and in 108 indication biopsies. We correlated TLR expression in different renal tissue compartments with kidney transplant function 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation, acute cellular rejection in renal grafts (according to the Banff classification), and urinary tract and cytomegalovirus infections. Results: We found a highly consistent correlation of TLR-2 expression in proximal and distal tubules, and in renal vessels (p < 0.001 for all compartments), but not for TLR-4 expression. This holds true for all protocol biopsy time points as well as for indication biopsies. Positive TLR-2 expression in renal tubules was associated with significantly (p < 0.05) better initial graft function as well as graft function 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation. We also found a significant (p < 0.05) association between TLR-2 expression and lower incidence of acute cellular rejection in early protocol biopsies (6 weeks). In contrast, positive TLR-4 expression was not related to kidney function or acute cellular rejection. Further, the two different TLR subtypes were not related to episodes of urinary tract or cytomegalovirus infections. Conclusion: TLR-2 expression in renal tissue is associated with superior graft function up to 2 years after kidney transplantation. The role of TLR-2 in the immune response against human kidney transplants warrants further investigation. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据