4.6 Article

Incidence and Mortality Rates of Syncope in the United States

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 181-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.08.024

关键词

Cardioverter-defibrillator; Incidence; Mortality; Pacemaker; Syncope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Syncope is a common cause of hospitalization in the US. The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence and mortality rates when patients are admitted with a principle diagnosis of syncope. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study included patients with the principle diagnosis of syncope identified from the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2000-2005. Incidence rate of syncope was adjusted according to the US Census data. In-hospital mortality and its predictors were identified by a logistic regression analysis, and Cochran-Armitage test was used for trend analysis. RESULTS: After data cleansing, 305,932 patients were included in the analysis. Adjusted incidence rate of syncope varied between 0.80 and 0.93 per 1000 person-years and was unchanged over the years included in the analysis. Overall mortality rate is 0.28%, a trend that has not changed over the years (P = 0.07). The odds ratio (OR) of death increased with age, becoming more prominent after age 40 years. Hospital mortality is higher in men (OR 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.71) and in patients with higher comorbidity index (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.20-1.62) for moderate, and (OR 4.14; 95% CI, 3.05-5.61) for severe comorbidity index. The median cost of hospitalization is $8579, which increased by 3- to 11-fold if patients had a cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. CONCLUSIONS: Syncope remains a common cause of hospital admission. The hospital mortality rate for syncope is low. A better definition and a nationally implemented care path for syncope diagnosis could provide a substantial cost savings. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. . The American Journal of Medicine (2009) 122, 181-188

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据