4.1 Article

Serotonin Transporter 5-HTTLPR Genotype Moderates the Effects of Childhood Adversity on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Risk: A Replication Study

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32068

关键词

gene-environment interaction; PTSD; childhood adversity; 5-HTTLPR

资金

  1. Alkermes
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Gilead
  4. Lundbeck
  5. Roche
  6. Lilly
  7. Merck
  8. Janssen
  9. Schering Plough
  10. Abbott
  11. Johnson Johnson
  12. ACTIVE
  13. NIH [R01 DA12690, R01 DA12849, R01 AA017535, R01 AA11330]
  14. US VA PTSD Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We reported that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) moderates the effect of childhood adversity on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) risk [Xie et al. (2009); Arch Gen Psychiatry 66 (11): 1201-1209]. In the present study, we considered 5,178 subjects (a group with generally high substance dependence comorbidity, as for our previous study) using similar methodology to replicate our previous results. We used logistic regression analyses to explore the interaction effect of 5-HTTLPR genotype and childhood adversity on PTSD risk. We found that, as reported in our previous study, in individuals with childhood adversity, the presence of one or two copies of the S allele of 5-HTTLPR increased the risk to develop PTSD. This gene-environment interaction effect was present in European Americans (EAs), but not in African Americans (AAs; EAs, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.07-2.08, P = 0.019; AAs, OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.60-1.35, P = 0.62). The statistical power to detect this interaction effect was increased when data were combined with those from our previous study [Xie et al. (2009); Arch Gen Psychiatry 66 (11): 1201-1209]. The findings reported here replicate those from our previous work, adding to a growing body of research demonstrating that the 5-HTTLPR genotype moderates risk for anxiety and depression phenotypes in the context of stress and adverse events. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据