4.4 Article

CQESTR simulation of management practice effects on long-term soil organic carbon

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 1486-1492

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0154

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Management of soil organic matter (SOM) is important for soil productivity and responsible utilization of crop residues for additional uses. CQESTR, pronounced sequester, a contraction of C sequestration (meaning C storage), is a C balance model that relates organic residue additions, crop management, and soil tillage to SOM accretion or loss. Our objective was to simulate SOM changes in agricultural Soils under a range of climate and management systems using the CQESTR model. Four long-term experiments (Champaign, IL, > 100 yr; Columbia, MO, > 100 yr; Lincoln, NE, 20 yr; Sidney, NE, 20 yr) in die United States under various crop rotations, tillage practices, organic amendments, and crop residue removal treatments were selected for their documented history of the long-term effects of management practice on SOM dynamics. CQESTR successfully simulated a Substantial decline in SOM with 50 yr of crop residue removal under various rotations at Columbia and Champaign. The increase in SOM following addition of manure was simulated well; however, the model underestimated SOM for a fertilized treatment at Columbia. predicted and observed values from the four sites were significantly related (r(2) = 0.94, n = 113, P < 0.001), with slope not significantly different from 1. Given the high correlation of simulated and observed SOM changes, CQESTR. can be used as a reliable tool to predict SOM changes from management practices and offers the potential for estimating soil C storage required for C credits. It can also be an important tool to estimate the impacts of crop residue removal for bioenergy production on SOM level and soil production capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据