4.2 Article

Further Evidence of the Importance of RIT1 in Noonan Syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 164, 期 11, 页码 2952-2957

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36722

关键词

left ventricular hypertrophy; noonan syndrome; RAS-MAPK signaling; RIT1; whole-exome sequencing

资金

  1. FAPESP [2011/17299-3]
  2. CNPq
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/17299-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noonan syndrome (NS) is an autosomal dominant disorder consisting of short stature, short and/or webbed neck, distinctive facial features, cardiac abnormalities, cryptorchidism, and coagulation defects. NS exhibits genetic heterogeneity, associated with mutated genes that participate in RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction. Recently, a new gene (RIT1) was discovered as the causative gene in 17 of 180 Japanese individuals who were negative for the previously known genes for NS and were studied using exome sequencing (four patients), followed by Sanger sequencing (13 patients). The present study used the same technique in 70 Brazilian patients with NS and identified six with RIT1 missense mutations. Thus, we confirm that RIT1 is responsible for approximately 10% of the patients negative for mutations in the previously known genes. The phenotype includes a high frequency of high birth weight, relative macrocephaly, left ventricular hypertrophy, and ectodermal findings, such as curly hair, hyperpigmentation, and wrinkled palms and soles. Short stature and pectus deformity were less frequent. The majority of patients with a RIT1 mutation did not show apparent intellectual disability. Because of the relatively high frequency of mutations in RIT1 among patients with NS and its occurrence in different populations, we suggest that it should be added to the list of genes included in panels for the molecular diagnosis of NS through targeted next-generation sequencing. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据