4.2 Article

Somatic CTNNB1 Mutation in Hepatoblastoma from a Patient with Simpson- Golabi- Behmel Syndrome and Germline GPC3 Mutation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 164, 期 4, 页码 993-997

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36364

关键词

hepatoblastoma; Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome; CTNNB1; GPC3

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on rare and intractable diseases [Jitsuyoka(Nanbyo)-Ippan-003, Jitsuyoka(Nanbyo)-Ippan-013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome is a rare overgrowth syndrome caused by the GPC3 mutation at Xq26 and is clinically characterized by multiple congenital abnormalities, intellectual disability, pre/postnatal overgrowth, distinctive craniofacial features, macrocephaly, and organomegaly. Although this syndrome is known to be associated with a risk for embryonal tumors, similar to other overgrowth syndromes, the pathogenetic basis of this mode of tumorigenesis remains largely unknown. Here, we report a boy with Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome who had a germline loss-of function mutation in GPC3. At 9 months of age, he developed hepatoblastoma. A comparison of exome analysis results for the germline genome and for the tumor genome revealed a somatic mutation, p.Ile35Ser, within the degradation targeting box of -catenin. The same somatic mutation in CTNNB1 has been repeatedly reported in hepatoblastoma and other cancers. This finding suggested that the CTNNB1 mutation in the tumor tissue represents a driver mutation and that both the GPC3 and the CTNNB1 mutations contributed to tumorigenesis in a clearly defined sequential manner in the propositus. The current observation of a somatic CTNNB1 mutation in a hepatoblastoma from a patient with a germline GPC3 mutation supports the notion that the mutation in GPC3 may influence one of the initial steps in tumorigenesis and the progression to hepatoblastoma. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据