期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 821-835出版社
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030
关键词
Kidney end point; renal end point; kidney disease outcome; surrogate end point; biomarker; chronic kidney disease (CKD); estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline; eGFR trajectory; renal function; serum creatinine; kidney disease progression; end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
资金
- Baxter
- Amgen
- Merck
- Astra Zeneca
- Abbott
- MSD
- BMS
- Novartis
- VITAE
- Takeda
- Hemocuem
- JJ
- REATA
- Astellas
- Abbvie
- Chemocentryx
- Pharmalink AB
- Jansen Pharmaceuticals
- Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
- Genkyotex SA
- Gilead Sciences
- National Institutes of Health
- NKF
The US Food and Drug Administration currently accepts halving of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), assessed as doubling of serum creatinine level, as a surrogate end point for the development of kidney failure in clinical trials of kidney disease progression. A doubling of serum creatinine level generally is a late event in chronic kidney disease (CKD); thus, there is great interest in considering alternative end points for clinical trials to shorten their duration, reduce sample size, and extend their conduct to patients with earlier stages of CKD. However, the relationship between lesser declines in GFR and the subsequent development of kidney failure has not been well characterized. The National Kidney Foundation and Food and Drug Administration sponsored a scientific workshop to critically examine available data to determine whether alternative GFR-based end points have sufficiently strong relationships with important clinical outcomes of CKD to be used in clinical trials. Based on a series of meta-analyses of cohorts and clinical trials and simulations of trial designs and analytic methods, the workshop concluded that a confirmed decline in estimated GFR of 30% over 2 to 3 years may be an acceptable surrogate end point in some circumstances, but the pattern of treatment effects on GFR must be examined, specifically acute effects on estimated GFR. An estimated GFR decline of 40% may be more broadly acceptable than a 30% decline across a wider range of baseline GFRs and patterns of treatment effects on GFR. However, there are other circumstances in which these end points could lead to a reduction in statistical power or erroneous conclusions regarding benefits or harms of interventions. We encourage careful consideration of these alternative end points in the design of future clinical trials. (C) 2014 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据